Heard on the street

“When it comes to the Robertsons, Princeton has clearly decided to ignore the intent of its donors.” Andrew Ferguson, Columnist, Bloomberg News, December 26, 2006.

Home

Welcome


Robert Halligan, Katherine (Robertson) Ernst, Anne (Robertson) Meier, and William Robertson, Plaintiffs in the lawsuit

Welcome to our web site. This site is dedicated to providing the public and the philanthropic community with information about our family’s lawsuit against Princeton University. Filed in 2002, Robertson v. Princeton University is perhaps the largest “donor intent” lawsuit in U.S. history and one of the most important legal cases to affect charitable giving in many decades. The outcome of the lawsuit will likely define “donor intent” in the 21st century.

Sincerely,
William Robertson
Lead Plaintiff
Robertson v. Princeton University

Background

In 1961, our parents, Charles (Princeton ’26) and Marie Robertson, donated 700,000 shares of A&P stock – worth $35 million at the time – to establish the Robertson Foundation. At the time, the gift – having now grown to over $750 million dollars – was one of the largest ever in support of higher education and the largest in Princeton's history.

The sole mission of the Foundation, according to the Composite Certificate of Incorporation, was “to strengthen the Government of the United States and increase its ability and determination to defend and extend freedom throughout the world by improving the facilities for the training and education of men and women for government service... with particular emphasis on the education of such persons for careers in those areas of the Federal Government that are concerned with international relations and affairs.”

Putting their faith in dad’s beloved alma mater, our parents selected Princeton to act as their trusted agent to vigorously pursue and accomplish the Foundation’s mission. Instead of taking the mission seriously, and instead of taking their fiduciary duties as Foundation trustees seriously, University officials secretly used the Foundation’s growing endowment as a University “piggy bank,” diverting more than $200 million to activities, projects, programs, and personnel unrelated to the mission. Worse still, during the more than 45 years the program has been in existence, University officials have placed very few graduates in government foreign-policy positions when compared to similar programs at other universities, most of which operate with significantly smaller budgets and do not have the government service focus that the Robertson Foundation has.

Because the University insists it has done no wrong, and refuses to make any meaningful changes in the way they spend the foundation's money, our family was forced to bring this lawsuit against them in 2002. We hope for a resolution to this matter in the near future, but until then, we will continue to share important information with Princeton alumni, the interested public and the philanthropic community, all of whom have a right to know what one of the country’s most prestigious universities has done to the largest donors in its history.

Donor Intent and the “Donor Bill of Rights”

Developed by the nation’s largest membership organizations for fundraising professionals, the Donor Bill of Rights cites “donor intent” as one of the primary “ethical standards and principles … for maintaining the public’s trust.” (Association of Fundraising Professionals)

The Donor Bill of Rights states that contributors to charity have the right “[T]o be assured their gifts will be used for the purposes for which they were given.”

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 16 August 2006 )
Read more...
Copyright 2006-2007