Heard on the street

“The outcome of the Princeton lawsuit, even though it is in state court, is likely to set a precedent in regard to ‘restricted’ gifts such as the Robertson endowment, either in favor of donor intent or in favor of the corrupt notion that donor intent is irrelevant.” Editorial, Leader-Herald, Gloversville, NY, Nov. 29, 2004.
 
Home > Press Room

Press Room


News Releases and Statements

November 1, 2007 What the Court said, and what it means

October 25, 2007  Robertson family wins key motions in lawsuit

November 29, 2006 Oral arguments on motions for partial summary judgment, Day 2

November 28, 2006 Oral arguments on motions for partial summary judgment, Day 1

January 23, 2006 Princeton misappropriates more than $207 million

June 17, 2004 Robertson family files amended complaint

November 6, 2003 PRINCO money grab


Fact Sheets


Background

Court Decisions to Date

Additional Background and Chronology

The Philanthropic Community's Position on Donor Intent

Public Opinion and Donor Intent

Other Prominent Controversies Involving Donor Intent

For Additional Information, contact:

 

PDF of full Fact Sheet

 

Op-eds:


The following articles by Robertson v. Princeton lead plaintiff William Robertson explain why the Robertson family is suing Princeton University, what they hope to accomplish, and why the lawsuit is important to the U.S. public, federal government, and the philanthropic and nonprofit communities.
 
“Freshman Ethics Lesson,” Pittsburgh (PA) Tribune Review, August 13, 2006
“Freshman Ethics Lesson,” Pittsburgh (PA) Tribune Review, August 13, 2006 Page 2
“Confidence in Nonprofits Eroding,” Tulsa (OK) World, June 18, 2006
“Princeton Ignoring Government’s Needs, Donors’ Wishes,” Chicago (IL) Sun Times, December 10, 2005
“Needed:  more Condis, Cranes,” Washington (DC) Examiner, February 23, 2005
“U.S. Needs its Best and Brightest Working in International Arena,” Fredericksburg (VA) Free Lance –Star, October 2, 2004
“Millions and Mistrust at Princeton University,” Trenton (NJ) Trentonian, July 17, 2004
“Graduation:  Time to Start ‘Giving Back?’,” New Britain (CT) Herald, May 18, 2004
“Abusing Donors’ Trust,” Washington (DC) Times, April 12, 2004
“Answering Kennedy’s Call to Service,” Metro West Daily News, Framingham, MA, January 26, 2004

“Princeton’s Perfidy,” New York (NY) Post, December 14, 2003
“It’s National Philanthropy Day, do you Know Where Your Money Is?” Christian Science Monitor, November 14, 2003
“After Alma Mater Gets Your Money, It Just Might Misplace Your Mission,” Los Angeles Times, October 31, 2003
“Princeton Ought to Keep Faith With Its Benefactors,” Newark (NJ) Star-Ledger, October 20, 2003



“Donor Intent” Survey


In December 2005, the Robertson family commissioned a national survey on “donor intent.”  Conducted by Zogby International, one of America’s leading public opinion research firms, the survey found that the vast majority of Americans believe that when gifts are given to nonprofit organizations for a specific purpose they must be used for that purpose – and organizations that violate donors’ trust should be penalized for their behavior.

Press release (59kb, pdf)
Zogby Survey (143kb, pdf)



 
Copyright 2006-2007